The ongoing debate on abortion in Kenya ... I wonder when will the 'Holy See' and their side-kicks and cronies will accept that only a few in the world give two hoots to children thrown in the garbage dumps, streets, abused and starved in homes and schools. Instead of caring for the alive but miserable in this world, they are driving the whole world to go ah la la ho over the unborn. This reminds me of a Buddhist श्लोक (verse):
In the great self existing mandal (a concentric structure) of dharmadhatu (spiritual metal)
where all phenomena reside free from cause and conditions.
Everywhere I look for the self called me (in the light of the abortion debate, I read ‘me’ as women),
it is nowhere to be found.
This life force (I take it as the foetus) is but a brief flicker
like a June bug in the night.
Happy is the yogin (the female knowledge-self who practices contemplation) who clasps the jewel of radiant
Bodhicitta (the aware/enlightened self) unbounded and self-perfected
Now, this interpretation of the श्लोक (verse) is far and away from the implied meaning, but this is what most often the interpretations do - they allow to interpret from the vantage point of the person interpreting (and that's how either distortions/retrogressive or progressive understandings emerge over a period)! In the second last sentence of this note, I have given a link to an interesting paper, which is not about morality or legality of abortion, but on a much narrow issue that when pregnant woman needs a treatment that would harm the foetus in her womb, should she be denied the treatment, or the foetus be put under threat that may affect it if born or find ways to abort the foetus safely. The paper goes on to say that the foetuses have legitimate interests, rather than rights, and a sick pregnant woman has the rights over her body and a right to health. So when there are competing interests, the rights of the woman to decide on her medical treatment, to give consent and her health should prevail. When you have opened the link, click on One-Click Download button on the top to download the paper: "Ethical and legal issues in reproductive health: Ethical and legal approaches to ‘the fetal patient’". It is worth a read!
Indian Homemaker 35p · 768 weeks ago
@nishaONnisaa · 768 weeks ago
girlsguidetosurvival 17p · 768 weeks ago
Will check the blog in next visit. Enjoy wordpress :)
Peace,
Desi Girl
nishaonnisaa 31p · 768 weeks ago
Varun Reddy · 767 weeks ago
nishaonnisaa 31p · 767 weeks ago
namit · 765 weeks ago
namit http://www.indiblogger.in/indipost.php?post=28218
do visit my post and do promote it if you like it.. :)
nishaonnisaa 31p · 765 weeks ago
As for this blog of mine, it take up the issue of the right to life of the mother vis-a-vis that of her foetus and her rights over her body and health over the right of the foetus to be born. There has been a prolonged deabte, often violent and violatative of women and girls' rights. Many across the word equate abortion to human-slaughter (killing) and so they argue that women and girls do not have a right to abort the foetus and if they do so, they should be punished for this.
nishaonnisaa 31p · 765 weeks ago
nishaonnisaa 31p · 765 weeks ago
the other important point is that the right to life is not the right to be saved. Most government, through law, make it an obligation of some institutions to save life (like police, doctors, etc). In this sense the law creates a right and makes protection of that right by some others an obligation. But such legal creation of the right to life and obligation to protect, does not always mean that the legal right holder also has a moral right to be protected by all and all others have a moral duty to protect that person's life. For example, a pregnant woman has a competing right to life with her foetus but she is not morally obligated to save the right to life of the foetus.
Hope the above makes some sense.
allmobitools · 301 weeks ago